that he can draw an exact picture of
you just by looking at that tooth,
would you be l i eve him? Wouldn’ t
i t sound j us t l i ke a hoax , i f he
claimed that not only could he
d r aw you bu t you r f ami l y as
we l l ? Obv i ou s l y , i t i s t o t a l
non s en s e t o t r y t o mak e a
d r aw i ng o f a c r ea t u r e and h i s
f ami l y by on l y l ook i ng a t a s i ng l e
t oo t h . I n 1927 , t he r e wa s an amaz i ng
di scovery . Al l the other ske l etal pi eces of the
creature to which the tooth belonged were found. The
tooth belonged neither to a human nor to an ape.
It belonged to a pig…
This event was a true disaster for evolutionists.
Do you see these drawings? Each evolutionist made different
drawings while looking at the same skull. They seem uncertain as to
how they should draw the creature. This is because such creatures
have never existed. These are all fabrications of adult professors!
What would your friends say if you found a bone while walking,
made a drawing like these and said, “Let me show you drawings of
creatures that lived long ago”?
You would probably never do such a thing, because you know that it
wouldn’t be intelligent. However, for some reason, evolutionary
scientists cannot understand how stupid such a thing is.
121
A drawing that appeared in
the Sunday times on 5th
April 1964
N. Parker’s drawing from
the National Geographic in
September 1960
Maurice Wilson’s
Drawing
